Paper detail

The EM Algorithm gives Sample-Optimality for Learning Mixtures of Well-Separated Gaussians

We consider the problem of spherical Gaussian Mixture models with $k \geq 3$ components when the components are well separated. A fundamental previous result established that separation of $Ω(\sqrt{\log k})$ is necessary and sufficient for identifiability of the parameters with polynomial sample complexity (Regev and Vijayaraghavan, 2017). In the same context, we show that $\tilde{O} (kd/ε^2)$ samples suffice for any $ε\lesssim 1/k$, closing the gap from polynomial to linear, and thus giving the first optimal sample upper bound for the parameter estimation of well-separated Gaussian mixtures. We accomplish this by proving a new result for the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm: we show that EM converges locally, under separation $Ω(\sqrt{\log k})$. The previous best-known guarantee required $Ω(\sqrt{k})$ separation (Yan, et al., 2017). Unlike prior work, our results do not assume or use prior knowledge of the (potentially different) mixing weights or variances of the Gaussian components. Furthermore, our results show that the finite-sample error of EM does not depend on non-universal quantities such as pairwise distances between means of Gaussian components.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.