Paper detail

The electronic structure of {\em R}NiC$_2$ intermetallic compounds

First-principles calculations of the electronic structure of members of the $R$NiC$_2$ series are presented, and their Fermi surfaces investigated for nesting propensities which might be linked to the charge-density waves exhibited by certain members of the series ($R$ = Sm, Gd and Nd). Calculations of the generalized susceptibility, $χ_{0}({\bf q},ω)$, show strong peaks at the same ${\bf q}$-vector in both the real and imaginary parts for these compounds. Moreover, this peak occurs at a wavevector which is very close to that experimentally observed in SmNiC$_2$. In contrast, for LaNiC$_2$ (which is a superconductor below 2.7K) as well as for ferromagnetic SmNiC$_2$, there is no such sharp peak. This could explain the absence of a charge-density wave transition in the former, and the destruction of the charge-density wave that has been observed to accompany the onset of ferromagnetic order in the latter.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.