Paper detail

The Banach-Tarski Paradox

In 1924, S. Banach and A. Tarski proved an astonishing, yet rather counterintuitive paradox: given a solid ball in $\mathbb{R}^3$, it is possible to partition it into finitely many pieces and reassemble them to form two solid balls, each identical in size to the first. When this paradox is applied to 3-dimensional space it does go against our intuition, but very often our intuition is flawed. The aim of the paper is to provide a comprehensive proof of the Banach-Tarski paradox, expanding in between the lines of the original volume. We explore the notions of paradoxical and equidecomposable sets which are phrased in terms of group actions. Finally, provided we have the Axiom of Choice at our disposal, we can construct sets that are nonmeasurable (not Lebesgue measurable) and the proof of the Banach-Tarski Paradox follows naturally.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.