BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Katie Buchhorn

Katie Buchhorn appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Applicationsmath.COmath.CTmath.FAmath.HOmath.LO

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Being Bayesian in the 2020s: opportunities and challenges in the practice of modern applied Bayesian statistics

Building on a strong foundation of philosophy, theory, methods and computation over the past three decades, Bayesian approaches are now an integral part of the toolkit for most statisticians and data scientists. Whether they are dedicated Bayesians or opportunistic users, applied professionals can now reap many of the benefits afforded by the Bayesian paradigm. In this paper, we touch on six modern opportunities and challenges in applied Bayesian statistics: intelligent data collection, new data sources, federated analysis, inference for implicit models, model transfer and purposeful software products.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Baumslag-Solitar graphs through colours

Higher-rank graphs are, as the name suggests, higher-dimensional analogues of directed graphs which we will define using category theory. The whole idea of my project was to construct what we call a Baumslag-Solitar graph, a higher-rank graph. They're too abstract an idea to picture, but in building Baumslag-Solitar graphs through coloured graphs, we are able to do so. I modelled my work on constructing Baumslag-Solitar graphs off Hazlewood, Raeburn, Sims, and Webster's Remarks on some fundamental results about higher-rank graphs and their $C^*$-algebras. This was a novel approach in understanding the generalisation of directed graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The Banach-Tarski Paradox

In 1924, S. Banach and A. Tarski proved an astonishing, yet rather counterintuitive paradox: given a solid ball in $\mathbb{R}^3$, it is possible to partition it into finitely many pieces and reassemble them to form two solid balls, each identical in size to the first. When this paradox is applied to 3-dimensional space it does go against our intuition, but very often our intuition is flawed. The aim of the paper is to provide a comprehensive proof of the Banach-Tarski paradox, expanding in between the lines of the original volume. We explore the notions of paradoxical and equidecomposable sets which are phrased in terms of group actions. Finally, provided we have the Axiom of Choice at our disposal, we can construct sets that are nonmeasurable (not Lebesgue measurable) and the proof of the Banach-Tarski Paradox follows naturally.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access