Paper detail

The ALMA REBELS Survey: Average [CII] $158\,\rm{μm}$ sizes of Star-Forming Galaxies from $z\sim 7$ to $z\sim 4$

We present the average [CII] $158\,\rm{μm}$ emission line sizes of UV-bright star-forming galaxies at $z\sim7$. Our results are derived from a stacking analysis of [CII] $158\,\rm{μm}$ emission lines and dust continua observed by ALMA, taking advantage of the large program Reionization Era Bright Emission Line Survey (REBELS). We find that the average [CII] emission at $z\sim7$ has an effective radius $r_e$ of $2.2\pm0.2\,\rm{kpc}$. It is $\gtrsim2\times$ larger than the dust continuum and the rest-frame UV emission, in agreement with recently reported measurements for $z\lesssim6$ galaxies. Additionally, we compared the average [CII] size with $4<z<6$ galaxies observed by the ALMA Large Program to INvestigate [CII] at Early times (ALPINE). By analysing [CII] sizes of $4<z<6$ galaxies in two redshift bins, we find an average [CII] size of $r_{\rm e}=2.2\pm0.2\,\rm{kpc}$ and $r_{\rm e}=2.5\pm0.2\,\rm{kpc}$ for $z\sim5.5$ and $z\sim4.5$ galaxies, respectively. These measurements show that star-forming galaxies, on average, show no evolution in the size of the [CII] $158\,{\rm μm}$ emitting regions at redshift between $z\sim7$ and $z\sim4$. This finding suggest that the star-forming galaxies could be morphologically dominated by gas over a wide redshift range.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access39 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.