Paper detail

Testing for spherical and elliptical symmetry

We construct new testing procedures for spherical and elliptical symmetry based on the characterization that a random vector $X$ with finite mean has a spherical distribution if and only if $\Ex[u^\top X | v^\top X] = 0$ holds for any two perpendicular vectors $u$ and $v$. Our test is based on the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic, and its rejection region is found via the spherically symmetric bootstrap. We show the consistency of the spherically symmetric bootstrap test using a general Donsker theorem which is of some independent interest. For the case of testing for elliptical symmetry, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic has an asymptotic drift term due to the estimated location and scale parameters. Therefore, an additional standardization is required in the bootstrap procedure. In a simulation study, the size and the power properties of our tests are assessed for several distributions and the performance is compared to that of several competing procedures.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.