Paper detail

Tensorization of quasi-Hilbertian Sobolev spaces

The tensorization problem for Sobolev spaces asks for a characterization of how the Sobolev space on a product metric measure space $X\times Y$ can be determined from its factors. We show that two natural descriptions of the Sobolev space from the literature coincide, $W^{1,2}(X\times Y)=J^{1,2}(X,Y)$, thus settling the tensorization problem for Sobolev spaces in the case $p=2$, when $X$ and $Y$ are infinitesimally quasi-Hilbertian, i.e. the Sobolev space $W^{1,2}$ admits an equivalent renorming by a Dirichlet form. This class includes in particular metric measure spaces $X,Y$ of finite Hausdorff dimension as well as infinitesimally Hilbertian spaces. More generally for $p\in (1,\infty)$ we obtain the norm-one inclusion $\|f\|_{J^{1,p}(X,Y)}\le \|f\|_{W^{1,p}(X\times Y)}$ and show that the norms agree on the algebraic tensor product $W^{1,p}(X)\otimes W^{1,p}(Y)\subset W^{1,p}(X\times Y)$. When $p=2$ and $X$ and $Y$ are infinitesimally quasi-Hilbertian, standard Dirichlet form theory yields the density of $W^{1,2}(X)\otimes W^{1,2}(Y)$ in $J^{1,2}(X,Y)$ thus implying the equality of the spaces. Our approach raises the question of the density of $W^{1,p}(X)\otimes W^{1,p}(Y)$ in $J^{1,p}(X,Y)$ in the general case.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.