Abstract

The tensorization problem for Sobolev spaces asks for a characterization of how the Sobolev space on a product metric measure space X×YX\times Y can be determined from its factors. We show that two natural descriptions of the Sobolev space from the literature coincide, W1,2(X×Y)=J1,2(X,Y)W^{1,2}(X\times Y)=J^{1,2}(X,Y), thus settling the tensorization problem for Sobolev spaces in the case p=2p=2, when XX and YY are infinitesimally quasi-Hilbertian, i.e. the Sobolev space W1,2W^{1,2} admits an equivalent renorming by a Dirichlet form. This class includes in particular metric measure spaces X,YX,Y of finite Hausdorff dimension as well as infinitesimally Hilbertian spaces. More generally for p∈(1,∞)p\in (1,\infty) we obtain the norm-one inclusion ∥f∥J1,p(X,Y)≤∥f∥W1,p(X×Y)\|f\|_{J^{1,p}(X,Y)}\le \|f\|_{W^{1,p}(X\times Y)} and show that the norms agree on the algebraic tensor product W1,p(X)⊗W1,p(Y)⊂W1,p(X×Y)W^{1,p}(X)\otimes W^{1,p}(Y)\subset W^{1,p}(X\times Y). When p=2p=2 and XX and YY are infinitesimally quasi-Hilbertian, standard Dirichlet form theory yields the density of W1,2(X)⊗W1,2(Y)W^{1,2}(X)\otimes W^{1,2}(Y) in J1,2(X,Y)J^{1,2}(X,Y) thus implying the equality of the spaces. Our approach raises the question of the density of W1,p(X)⊗W1,p(Y)W^{1,p}(X)\otimes W^{1,p}(Y) in J1,p(X,Y)J^{1,p}(X,Y) in the general case.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.