Paper detail

Systematic study for particle transverse momentum asymmetry in minimum bias pp collisions at LHC energies

In PYTHIA6 (PYTHIA8) once the transverse momentum $p_T$ of a generated particle is randomly sampled, $p_x$ and $p_y$ are set on the circle with radius of $p_T$ randomly. This may largely suppress the development of the final hadronic state transverse momentum anisotropy from the initial state spatial asymmetry. We modify PYTHIA6.4 by randomly setting $p_x$ and $p_y$ on the circumference of an ellipse with the half major and minor axes being $p_T(1+δ_p)$ and $p_T(1-δ_p)$, respectively. The modified PYTHIA6.4 is then employed to systematically study the charged particle transverse momentum asymmetry in the minimum bias pp collisions at $\sqrt s$=0.9, 7, and 14 TeV. The ALICE data on the transverse sphericity as a function of charged multiplicity, $<S_T>(N_{ch})$, are well reproduced with the modified PYTHIA6.4. It is found that the predicted charged particle $v_2$ upper limit is a measurable value, $\sim 0.12$, in the minimum bias pp collisions at $\sqrt s$=7 TeV. We suggest a systematic measurement for the particle transverse momentum sphericity, eccentricity (ellipticity), and elliptic flow parameter.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.