Paper detail

Systematic extraction of crystal electric-field effects and quantum magnetic model parameters in triangular rare-earth magnets

A primary goal at the interface of theoretical and experimental quantum magnetism is the investigation of exotic spin states, most notably quantum spin liquids (QSLs). Magnetic rare-earth ions go beyond the straightforward paradigm of geometrical frustration in Heisenberg antiferromagnets by introducing competing energy scales, and in particular their strong spin-orbit coupling creates multiple split crystal electric-field (CEF) levels, leading to anisotropic effective spin models with intrinsic frustration. While rare-earth delafossites have a triangular-lattice geometry, and thus have gained recent attention as candidates for hosting spin-1/2 QSL physics, the reliable extraction of effective spin models from the initial many-parameter CEF spectrum is a hard problem. Using the example of CsYbSe2, we demonstrate the unambiguous extraction of the Stevens-operators coefficients dictating the full CEF spectrum of Yb$^{3+}$ by translating these into parameters with a direct physical interpretation. Specifically, we combine low-field susceptibility measurements with resonant torsion magnetometry experiments in fields up to 60 T to determine a sufficiently large number of physical parameters -- effective Zeeman splittings, anisotropic van Vleck coefficients, and magnetotropic coefficients -- that the set of Stevens-operator coefficients is unique. Our crucial identification of the strong corrections to the Zeeman splitting of Kramers doublets as van Vleck coefficients has direct consequences for the interpretation of all anisotropic magnetic susceptibility measurements. Our results allow us to determine the nature and validity of an effective spin-1/2 model for CsYbSe2, to provide input for theoretical studies of such models on the triangular lattice, and to provide additional materials insight into routes for achieving magnetic frustration and candidate QSL systems in rare-earth compounds.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.