Paper detail

Symmetry energy of cold nucleonic matter within a relativistic mean field model encapsulating effects of high momentum nucleons induced by short-range correlations

Significant progress has been made recently in constraining the isospin-dependent parameters characterizing the SRC (short-range correlation)-modified single-nucleon momentum distribution in neutron-rich nucleonic matter using both experimental data and microscopic model calculations. Using the constrained single-nucleon momentum distribution in a nonlinear relativistic mean field (RMF) model, we study the equation of state (EOS) of asymmetric nucleonic matter (ANM), especially the density dependence of nuclear symmetry energy $E_{\rm{sym}}(ρ)$. Firstly, as a test of the model, the average nucleon kinetic energy extracted recently from electron-nucleus scattering experiments using a neutron-proton dominance model is well reproduced by the RMF model incorporating effects of the SRC-induced high momentum nucleons, while it is significantly under predicted by the RMF model using a step function for the single-nucleon momentum distribution as in free Fermi gas (FFG) models. Secondly, the kinetic symmetry energy of quasi-nucleons is found to be $E^{\rm{kin}}_{\rm{sym}}(ρ_0)=-16.94\pm13.66\,\rm{MeV}$ which is dramatically different from the prediction of $E^{\rm{kin}}_{\rm{sym}}(ρ_0)\approx 12.5$ MeV by FFG models at nuclear matter saturation density $ρ_0=0.16\,\rm{fm}^{-3}$. Thirdly, comparing the RMF calculations with and without the high momentum nucleons using two sets of model parameters both reproducing identically all empirically constraints on the EOS of symmetric nuclear matter (SNM) and the symmetry energy of ANM at $ρ_0$, the SRC-modified single-nucleon momentum distribution is found to make the $E_{\rm{sym}}(ρ)$ more concave around $ρ_0$ by softening it significantly at both sub-saturation and supra-saturation densities, leading to an isospin-dependent incompressibility of ANM in better agreement with existing experimental data.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.