Paper detail

Survival Prediction of Brain Cancer with Incomplete Radiology, Pathology, Genomics, and Demographic Data

Integrating cross-department multi-modal data (e.g., radiological, pathological, genomic, and clinical data) is ubiquitous in brain cancer diagnosis and survival prediction. To date, such an integration is typically conducted by human physicians (and panels of experts), which can be subjective and semi-quantitative. Recent advances in multi-modal deep learning, however, have opened a door to leverage such a process to a more objective and quantitative manner. Unfortunately, the prior arts of using four modalities on brain cancer survival prediction are limited by a "complete modalities" setting (i.e., with all modalities available). Thus, there are still open questions on how to effectively predict brain cancer survival from the incomplete radiological, pathological, genomic, and demographic data (e.g., one or more modalities might not be collected for a patient). For instance, should we use both complete and incomplete data, and more importantly, how to use those data? To answer the preceding questions, we generalize the multi-modal learning on cross-department multi-modal data to a missing data setting. Our contribution is three-fold: 1) We introduce optimal multi-modal learning with missing data (MMD) pipeline with optimized hardware consumption and computational efficiency; 2) We extend multi-modal learning on radiological, pathological, genomic, and demographic data into missing data scenarios; 3) a large-scale public dataset (with 962 patients) is collected to systematically evaluate glioma tumor survival prediction using four modalities. The proposed method improved the C-index of survival prediction from 0.7624 to 0.8053.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.