Paper detail

Surrogate Ensemble Forecasting for Dynamic Climate Impact Models

As acute climate change impacts weather and climate variability, there is increased demand for robust climate impact model predictions from which forecasts of the impacts can be derived. The quality of those predictions are limited by the climate drivers for the impact models which are nonlinear and highly variable in nature. One way to estimate the uncertainty of the model drivers is to assess the distribution of ensembles of climate forecasts. To capture the uncertainty in the impact model outputs associated with the distribution of the input climate forecasts, each individual forecast ensemble member has to be propagated through the physical model which can imply high computational costs. It is therefore desirable to train a surrogate model which allows predictions of the uncertainties of the output distribution in ensembles of climate drivers, thus reducing resource demands. This study considers a climate driven disease model, the Liverpool Malaria Model (LMM), which predicts the malaria transmission coefficient R0. Seasonal ensembles forecasts of temperature and precipitation with a 6-month horizon are propagated through the model, predicting the distribution of transmission time series. The input and output data is used to train surrogate models in the form of a Random Forest Quantile Regression (RFQR) model and a Bayesian Long Short-Term Memory (BLSTM) neural network. Comparing the predictive performance, the RFQR better predicts the time series of the individual ensemble member, while the BLSTM offers a direct way to construct a combined distribution for all ensemble members. An important element of the proposed methodology is that accounting for non-normal distributions of climate forecast ensembles can be captured naturally by a Bayesian formulation.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.