Paper detail

SURGE: SuperBatch Unified Resource-efficient GPU Encoding for Heterogeneous Partitioned Data

We present SURGE, a streaming GPU encoding system deployed in production to generate embeddings for over 800 million texts across 40,000 logical partitions. Production embedding pipelines face a tension between logical data partitioning and efficient GPU utilization: processing each partition independently incurs $P$ inter-process communication (IPC) calls whose overhead limits throughput for compute-light models. Our contributions are analytical: (i) a cost model (Theorem 1) predicting throughput within 2% across three encoders spanning a 15$\times$ parameter range; (ii) a memory-safety bound (Lemma 3) enabling a streaming two-threshold policy with peak memory $O(B_{\min} + n_{\max})$ rather than $O(N)$; and (iii) a $φ$/CV decision framework characterizing when the pattern applies beyond our workload. The naive fix of batching at fixed size requires $O(N)$ peak memory (32.7 GB at 10M texts; infeasible beyond ~60M on 192 GB nodes), produces no output until all encoding completes, and offers no fault tolerance. SURGE achieves the same throughput with $O(B_{\min} + n_{\max})$ bounded memory (2.6 GB), 68$\times$ faster time-to-first-output, and crash recovery at SuperBatch granularity. On 10M texts with 4 NVIDIA L4 GPUs, SURGE delivers 26,413 texts/s -- matching fixed-batch throughput while using 12.6$\times$ less memory. We validate on bge-base (109M, $d$=768, error 1.3%) and across log-normal $σ$ in {1.0, 1.72, 2.5} (speedup invariant within $\pm$3%), and compare against a partition-batched baseline (PB-PBP-LB), against which SURGE retains a 7% throughput edge and 2.5$\times$ faster TTFO. Complementary engineering -- zero-copy Arrow serialization (22-25$\times$ speedup) and async I/O pipelining (up to 93% benefit) -- realizes the design but is not the contribution.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.