Paper detail

Support union recovery in high-dimensional multivariate regression

In multivariate regression, a $K$-dimensional response vector is regressed upon a common set of $p$ covariates, with a matrix $B^*\in\mathbb{R}^{p\times K}$ of regression coefficients. We study the behavior of the multivariate group Lasso, in which block regularization based on the $\ell_1/\ell_2$ norm is used for support union recovery, or recovery of the set of $s$ rows for which $B^*$ is nonzero. Under high-dimensional scaling, we show that the multivariate group Lasso exhibits a threshold for the recovery of the exact row pattern with high probability over the random design and noise that is specified by the sample complexity parameter $θ(n,p,s):=n/[2ψ(B^*)\log(p-s)]$. Here $n$ is the sample size, and $ψ(B^*)$ is a sparsity-overlap function measuring a combination of the sparsities and overlaps of the $K$-regression coefficient vectors that constitute the model. We prove that the multivariate group Lasso succeeds for problem sequences $(n,p,s)$ such that $θ(n,p,s)$ exceeds a critical level $θ_u$, and fails for sequences such that $θ(n,p,s)$ lies below a critical level $θ_{\ell}$. For the special case of the standard Gaussian ensemble, we show that $θ_{\ell}=θ_u$ so that the characterization is sharp. The sparsity-overlap function $ψ(B^*)$ reveals that, if the design is uncorrelated on the active rows, $\ell_1/\ell_2$ regularization for multivariate regression never harms performance relative to an ordinary Lasso approach and can yield substantial improvements in sample complexity (up to a factor of $K$) when the coefficient vectors are suitably orthogonal. For more general designs, it is possible for the ordinary Lasso to outperform the multivariate group Lasso. We complement our analysis with simulations that demonstrate the sharpness of our theoretical results, even for relatively small problems.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.