Paper detail

Studentising Kendall's Tau: U-Statistic Estimators and Bias Correction for a Generalised Rank Variance-Covariance framework

Kemeny (1959) introduced a topologically complete metric space to study ordinal random variables, particularly in the context of Condorcet's paradox and the measurability of ties. Building on this, Emond & Mason (2002) reformulated Kemeny's framework into a rank correlation coefficient by embedding the metric space into a Hilbert structure. This transformation enables the analysis of data under weak order-preserving transformations (monotonically non-decreasing) within a linear probabilistic framework. However, the statistical properties of this rank correlation estimator, such as bias, estimation variance, and Type I error rates, have not been thoroughly evaluated. In this paper, we derive and prove a complete U-statistic estimator in the presence of ties for Kemeny's \(τ_κ\), addressing the positive bias introduced by tied ranks. We also introduce a consistent population standard error estimator. The null distribution of the test statistic is shown to follow a \(t_{(N-2)}\)-distribution. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms Kendall's \(τ_{b}\), offering a more accurate and robust measure of ordinal association which is topologically complete upon standard linear models.

preprint2025arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.