Paper detail

Stochastic Rank Aggregation

This paper addresses the problem of rank aggregation, which aims to find a consensus ranking among multiple ranking inputs. Traditional rank aggregation methods are deterministic, and can be categorized into explicit and implicit methods depending on whether rank information is explicitly or implicitly utilized. Surprisingly, experimental results on real data sets show that explicit rank aggregation methods would not work as well as implicit methods, although rank information is critical for the task. Our analysis indicates that the major reason might be the unreliable rank information from incomplete ranking inputs. To solve this problem, we propose to incorporate uncertainty into rank aggregation and tackle the problem in both unsupervised and supervised scenario. We call this novel framework {stochastic rank aggregation} (St.Agg for short). Specifically, we introduce a prior distribution on ranks, and transform the ranking functions or objectives in traditional explicit methods to their expectations over this distribution. Our experiments on benchmark data sets show that the proposed St.Agg outperforms the baselines in both unsupervised and supervised scenarios.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.