Paper detail

Stationary Points of Shallow Neural Networks with Quadratic Activation Function

We consider the teacher-student setting of learning shallow neural networks with quadratic activations and planted weight matrix $W^*\in\mathbb{R}^{m\times d}$, where $m$ is the width of the hidden layer and $d\le m$ is the data dimension. We study the optimization landscape associated with the empirical and the population squared risk of the problem. Under the assumption the planted weights are full-rank we obtain the following results. First, we establish that the landscape of the empirical risk admits an &#34;energy barrier&#34; separating rank-deficient $W$ from $W^*$: if $W$ is rank deficient, then its risk is bounded away from zero by an amount we quantify. We then couple this result by showing that, assuming number $N$ of samples grows at least like a polynomial function of $d$, all full-rank approximate stationary points of the empirical risk are nearly global optimum. These two results allow us to prove that gradient descent, when initialized below the energy barrier, approximately minimizes the empirical risk and recovers the planted weights in polynomial-time. Next, we show that initializing below this barrier is in fact easily achieved when the weights are randomly generated under relatively weak assumptions. We show that provided the network is sufficiently overparametrized, initializing with an appropriate multiple of the identity suffices to obtain a risk below the energy barrier. At a technical level, the last result is a consequence of the semicircle law for the Wishart ensemble and could be of independent interest. Finally, we study the minimizers of the empirical risk and identify a simple necessary and sufficient geometric condition on the training data under which any minimizer has necessarily zero generalization error. We show that as soon as $N\ge N^*=d(d+1)/2$, randomly generated data enjoys this geometric condition almost surely, while that ceases to be true if $N<N^*$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.