Paper detail

Spin transfer torque in Mn$_3$Ga-based ferrimagnetic tunnel junctions from first principles

We report on first-principles calculations of spin-transfer torque (STT) in epitaxial magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs) based on ferrimagnetic tetragonal Mn$_3$Ga electrodes, both as analyzer in an Fe/MgO stack, and also in an analogous stack with a second Mn$_3$Ga electrode (instead of Fe) as polarizer. Solving the ballistic transport problem (NEGF + DFT) for the nonequilibrium spin density in a scattering region extended to over 7.6 nm into the Mn$_3$Ga electrode, we find long-range spatial oscillations of the STT decaying on a length scale of a few tens of angstroms, both in the linear response regime and for finite bias. The oscillatory behavior of the STT in Mn$_3$Ga is robust against variations in the stack geometry and the applied bias voltage, which may affect the phase and the amplitude of the spatial oscillation, but the wave number is only responsive to variations in the longitudinal lattice constant of Mn$_3$Ga (for fixed in-plane geometry) without being commensurate with the lattice. Our interpretation of the long-range STT oscillations is based on the bulk electronic structure of Mn$_3$Ga, taking also into account the spin-filtering properties of the MgO barrier. Comparison to a fully Mn$_3$Ga-based stack shows similar STT oscillations, but a significant enhancement of both the TMR effect at the Fermi level and the STT at the interface, due to resonant tunneling for the mirror-symmetric junction with thinner barrier (three monoatomic layers). From the calculated energy dependence of the spin-polarized transmissions at 0 V, we anticipate asymmetric or symmetric TMR as a function of the applied bias voltage for the Fe-based and the all-Mn$_3$Ga stacks, respectively, which also both exhibit a sign change below 1 V. In the latter (symmetric) case we expect a TMR peak at zero, which is larger for the thinner barriers because of a spin-polarized resonant tunneling contribution.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.