Paper detail

Spectroscopic Evidence for Competing Order-Induced Pseudogap Phenomena and Unconventional Low-Energy Excitations in High-TC Cuprate Superconductors

The low-energy excitations of cuprate superconductors exhibit various characteristics that differ from those of simple Bogoliubov quasiparticles for pure d_{x^2-y^2}-wave superconductors. Here we report experimental studies of spatially resolved quasiparticle tunnelling spectra of hole- and electron-type cuprate superconductors that manifest direct evidences for the presence of competing orders (COs) in the cuprates. In contrast to conventional type-II superconductors that exhibit enhanced local density of states (LDOS) peaking at zero energy near the centre of field-induced vortices, the vortex-state LDOS of YBa_2Cu_3O_{7-δ} (Y-123) and La_{0.1}Sr_{0.9}CuO_2 (La-112) remains suppressed inside the vortex core, with pseudogap (PG)-like features at an energy larger (smaller) than the superconducting (SC) gap Δ_{SC} in Y-123 (La-112). Energy histograms of the SC and PG features reveal steady spectral shifts from SC to PG with increasing magnetic field H. These findings may be explained by coexisting COs and SC: For hole-type cuprates with PG above T_c, the primary CO gap (V_{CO}) is larger than Δ_{SC} and the corresponding COs are charge/pair-density waves with wave-vectors parallel to (π,0)/(0,π). For electron-type cuprates without PG above T_c, V_{CO} is smaller than Δ_{SC} and the CO wave-vector is along (π,π). This CO scenario may be extended to the ARPES data to consistently account for the presence (absence) of Fermi arcs in hole- (electron)-type cuprates. Fourier transformation of the vortex-state LDOS in Y-123 further reveals multiple sets of energy-independent wave-vectors due to field-enhanced pair- and spin-density waves. These results imply important interplay of SC with low-energy collective excitations.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.