Paper detail

Spatio-temporal distribution of nucleation events during crystal growth

We consider irreversible second-layer nucleation that occurs when two adatoms on a terrace meet. We solve the problem analytically in one dimension for zero and infinite step-edge barriers, and numerically for any value of the barriers in one and two dimensions. For large barriers, the spatial distribution of nucleation events strongly differs from $ρ^2$, where $ρ$ is the stationary adatom density in the presence of a constant flux. The probability $Q(t)$ that nucleation occurs at time $t$ after the deposition of the second adatom, decays for short time as a power law [$Q(t)\sim t^{-1/2}$] in $d=1$ and logarithmically [$Q(t)\sim 1/\ln(t/t_0)$] in $d=2$; for long time it decays exponentially. Theories of the nucleation rate $ω$ based on the assumption that it is proportional to $ρ^2$ are shown to overestimate $ω$ by a factor proportional to the number of times an adatom diffusing on the terrace visits an already visited lattice site.

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.