Paper detail

Spatially inhomogeneous linear inverse problems with possible singularities

The objective of the present paper is to introduce the concept of a spatially inhomogeneous linear inverse problem where the degree of ill-posedness of operator $Q$ depends not only on the scale but also on location. In this case, the rates of convergence are determined by the interaction of four parameters, the smoothness and spatial homogeneity of the unknown function $f$ and degrees of ill-posedness and spatial inhomogeneity of operator $Q$. Estimators obtained in the paper are based either on wavelet-vaguelette decomposition (if the norms of all vaguelettes are finite) or on a hybrid of wavelet-vaguelette decomposition and Galerkin method (if vaguelettes in the neighborhood of the singularity point have infinite norms). The hybrid estimator is a combination of a linear part in the vicinity of the singularity point and the nonlinear block thresholding wavelet estimator elsewhere. To attain adaptivity, an optimal resolution level for the linear, singularity affected, portion of the estimator is obtained using Lepski [Theory Probab. Appl. 35 (1990) 454-466 and 36 (1991) 682-697] method and is used subsequently as the lowest resolution level for the nonlinear wavelet estimator. We show that convergence rates of the hybrid estimator lie within a logarithmic factor of the optimal minimax convergence rates. The theory presented in the paper is supplemented by examples of deconvolution with a spatially inhomogeneous kernel and deconvolution in the presence of locally extreme noise or extremely inhomogeneous design. The first two problems are examined via a limited simulation study which demonstrates advantages of the hybrid estimator when the degree of spatial inhomogeneity is high. In addition, we apply the technique to recovery of a convolution signal transmitted via amplitude modulation.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.