Paper detail

Sparse Multi-Reference Alignment : Phase Retrieval, Uniform Uncertainty Principles and the Beltway Problem

Motivated by cutting-edge applications like cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM), the Multi-Reference Alignment (MRA) model entails the learning of an unknown signal from repeated measurements of its images under the latent action of a group of isometries and additive noise of magnitude $σ$. Despite significant interest, a clear picture for understanding rates of estimation in this model has emerged only recently, particularly in the high-noise regime $σ\gg 1$ that is highly relevant in applications. Recent investigations have revealed a remarkable asymptotic sample complexity of order $σ^6$ for certain signals whose Fourier transforms have full support, in stark contrast to the traditional $σ^2$ that arise in regular models. Often prohibitively large in practice, these results have prompted the investigation of variations around the MRA model where better sample complexity may be achieved. In this paper, we show that sparse signals exhibit an intermediate $σ^4$ sample complexity even in the classical MRA model. Further, we characterise the dependence of the estimation rate on the support size $s$ as $O_p(1)$ and $O_p(s^{3.5})$ in the dilute and moderate regimes of sparsity respectively. Our techniques have implications for the problem of crystallographic phase retrieval, indicating a certain local uniqueness for the recovery of sparse signals from their power spectrum. Our results explore and exploit connections of the MRA estimation problem with two classical topics in applied mathematics: the beltway problem from combinatorial optimization, and uniform uncertainty principles from harmonic analysis. Our techniques include a certain enhanced form of the probabilistic method, which might be of general interest in its own right.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.