Paper detail

Some remarks on Tsallis relative operator entropy

This paper intends to give some new estimates for Tsallis relative operator entropy ${{T}_{v}}\left( A|B \right)=\frac{A{{\natural}_{v}}B-A}{v}$. Let $A$ and $B$ be two positive invertible operators with the spectra contained in the interval $J \subset (0,\infty)$. We prove for any $v\in \left[ -1,0 \right)\cup \left( 0,1 \right]$, $$ (\ln_v t)A+\left( A{{\natural}_{v}}B+tA{{\natural}_{v-1}}B \right)\le {{T}_{v}}\left( A|B \right) \le (\ln_v s)A+{{s}^{v-1}}\left( B-sA \right) $$ where $s,t\in J$. Especially, the upper bound for Tsallis relative operator entropy is a non-trivial new result. Meanwhile, some related and new results are also established. In particular, the monotonicity for Tsallis relative operator entropy is improved. Furthermore, we introduce the exponential type relative operator entropies which are special cases of the perspective and we give inequalities among them and usual relative operator entropies.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.