Paper detail

Some improvements on the constants for the real Bohnenblust-Hille inequality

A classical inequality due to Bohnenblust and Hille states that for every $N \in \mathbb{N}$ and every $m$-linear mapping $U:\ell_{\infty}^{N}\times...\times\ell_{\infty}^{N}\rightarrow\mathbb{C}$ we have \[(\sum\limits_{i_{1},...,i_{m}=1}^{N}| U(e_{i_{^{1}}},...,e_{i_{m}})| ^{\frac{2m}{m+1}}) ^{\frac{m+1}{2m}}\leq C_{m}| U|] where $C_{m}=2^{\frac{m-1}{2}}$. The result is also true for real Banach spaces. In this note we show that an adequate use of a recent new proof of Bohnenblust-Hille inequality, due to Defant, Popa and Schwarting, combined with the optimal constants of Khinchine's inequality (due to Haagerup) provides quite better estimates for the constants involved in the real Bohnenblust-Hille inequality. For instance, for $2\leq m\leq 14,$ we show that the constants $C_{m}=2^\frac{m-1}{2}$ can be replaced by $2^{\frac{m^{2}+6m-8}{8m}}$ if $m$ is even and by $2^{\frac{m^{2}+6m-7}{8m}}$ if $m$ is odd, which substantially improve the known values of $C_{m}$. We also show that the new constants present a better asymptotic behavior.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.