Paper detail

Solution of linear ill-posed problems using overcomplete dictionaries

In the present paper we consider application of overcomplete dictionaries to solution of general ill-posed linear inverse problems. Construction of an adaptive optimal solution for such problems usually relies either on a singular value decomposition or representation of the solution via an orthonormal basis. The shortcoming of both approaches lies in the fact that, in many situations, neither the eigenbasis of the linear operator nor a standard orthonormal basis constitutes an appropriate collection of functions for sparse representation of the unknown function. In the context of regression problems, there have been an enormous amount of effort to recover an unknown function using an overcomplete dictionary. One of the most popular methods, Lasso, is based on minimizing the empirical likelihood and requires stringent assumptions on the dictionary, the, so called, compatibility conditions. While these conditions may be satisfied for the original dictionary functions, they usually do not hold for their images due to contraction imposed by the linear operator. In what follows, we bypass this difficulty by a novel approach which is based on inverting each of the dictionary functions and matching the resulting expansion to the true function, thus, avoiding unrealistic assumptions on the dictionary and using Lasso in a predictive setting. We examine both the white noise and the observational model formulations and also discuss how exact inverse images of the dictionary functions can be replaced by their approximate counterparts. Furthermore, we show how the suggested methodology can be extended to the problem of estimation of a mixing density in a continuous mixture. For all the situations listed above, we provide the oracle inequalities for the risk in a finite sample setting. Simulation studies confirm good computational properties of the Lasso-based technique.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.