Paper detail

Snowflake universality of Wasserstein spaces

For $p\in (1,\infty)$ let $\mathscr{P}_p(\mathbb{R}^3)$ denote the metric space of all $p$-integrable Borel probability measures on $\mathbb{R}^3$, equipped with the Wasserstein $p$ metric $\mathsf{W}_p$. We prove that for every $\varepsilon>0$, every $θ\in (0,1/p]$ and every finite metric space $(X,d_X)$, the metric space $(X,d_{X}^θ)$ embeds into $\mathscr{P}_p(\mathbb{R}^3)$ with distortion at most $1+\varepsilon$. We show that this is sharp when $p\in (1,2]$ in the sense that the exponent $1/p$ cannot be replaced by any larger number. In fact, for arbitrarily large $n\in \mathbb{N}$ there exists an $n$-point metric space $(X_n,d_n)$ such that for every $α\in (1/p,1]$ any embedding of the metric space $(X_n,d_n^α)$ into $\mathscr{P}_p(\mathbb{R}^3)$ incurs distortion that is at least a constant multiple of $(\log n)^{α-1/p}$. These statements establish that there exists an Alexandrov space of nonnegative curvature, namely $\mathscr{P}_{\! 2}(\mathbb{R}^3)$, with respect to which there does not exist a sequence of bounded degree expander graphs. It also follows that $\mathscr{P}_{\! 2}(\mathbb{R}^3)$ does not admit a uniform, coarse, or quasisymmetric embedding into any Banach space of nontrivial type. Links to several longstanding open questions in metric geometry are discussed, including the characterization of subsets of Alexandrov spaces, existence of expanders, the universality problem for $\mathscr{P}_{\! 2}(\mathbb{R}^k)$, and the metric cotype dichotomy problem.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.