Paper detail

Small linearly equivalent $G$-sets and a construction of Beaulieu

Two $G$-sets ($G$ a finite group) are called linearly equivalent over a commutative ring $k$ if the permutation representations $k[X]$ and $k[Y]$ are isomorphic as modules over the group algebra $kG$. Pairs of linearly equivalent non-isomorphic $G$-sets have applications in number theory and geometry. We characterize the groups $G$ for which such pairs exist for any field, and give a simple construction of these pairs. If $k$ is $\Q$, these are precisely the non-cyclic groups. For any non-cyclic group, we prove that there exist $G$-sets which are non-isomorphic and \lineq over $\Q$, of cardinality $\leq 3(#G)/2$. Also, we investigate a construction of P. Beaulieu which allows us to construct pairs of transitive linearly equivalent $S_n$-sets from arbitrary $G$-sets for an arbitrary group $G$. We show that this construction works over all fields and use it construct, for each finite set $\mc P$ of primes, $S_n$-sets linearly equivalent over a field $k$ if and only if the characteristic of $k$ lies in $\mc P$.

preprint2008arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.