Paper detail

Slightly Conservative Bootstrap for Maxima of Sums

We study the bootstrap for the maxima of the sums of independent random variables, a problem of high relevance to many applications in modern statistics. Since the consistency of bootstrap was justified by Gaussian approximation in Chernozhukov et al. (2013), quite a few attempts have been made to sharpen the error bound for bootstrap and reduce the sample size requirement for bootstrap consistency. In this paper, we show that the sample size requirement can be dramatically improved when we make the inference slightly conservative, that is, to inflate the bootstrap quantile $t_α^*$ by a small fraction, e.g. by $1\%$ to $1.01\,t^*_α$. This simple procedure yields error bounds for the coverage probability of conservative bootstrap at as fast a rate as $\sqrt{(\log p)/n}$ under suitable conditions, so that not only the sample size requirement can be reduced to $\log p \ll n$ but also the overall convergence rate is nearly parametric. Furthermore, we improve the error bound for the coverage probability of the standard non-conservative bootstrap to $[(\log (np))^3 (\log p)^2/n]^{1/4}$ under general assumptions on data. These results are established for the empirical bootstrap and the multiplier bootstrap with third moment match. An improved coherent Lindeberg interpolation method, originally proposed in Deng and Zhang (2017), is developed to derive sharper comparison bounds, especially for the maxima.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.