Paper detail

Size-dependent mass absorption cross-section of soot particles from various sources

The mass absorption cross-section (MAC) of combustion-generated soot is used in pollution and emissions measurements to quantify the mass concentration of soot and in atmospheric modelling to predict the radiative effects of soot on climate. Previous work has suggested that the MAC of soot particles may change with their size, due to (1) internal scattering among monomers in the soot aggregate, (2) the correlation of soot primary-particle diameter with aggregate size, (3) quantum confinement effects, or (4) a size-dependent degree of soot graphitization. Here, we report a size-dependent MAC for ex-situ soot sampled from two commercially available diffusion-flame soot generators, one aviation turbine engine, and one diesel generator. We also incorporate literature data. We show that the MAC increases with aggregate size until a plateau is reached at single particle masses between 4 and 30 fg (approximately 300-650 nm soot mobility diameter). The smallest particles may have MACs 50% to 80% smaller than the largest, depending on the source, while the largest particles have MACs within the range reported by previous measurements on polydisperse samples. Moreover, we show that models of hypotheses (1), (2), and (3) do not describe our measurement results, leaving hypothesis (4) as the only remaining candidate.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.