Source author record

Greg J. Smallwood

Greg J. Smallwood appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Size-dependent mass absorption cross-section of soot particles from various sources

The mass absorption cross-section (MAC) of combustion-generated soot is used in pollution and emissions measurements to quantify the mass concentration of soot and in atmospheric modelling to predict the radiative effects of soot on climate. Previous work has suggested that the MAC of soot particles may change with their size, due to (1) internal scattering among monomers in the soot aggregate, (2) the correlation of soot primary-particle diameter with aggregate size, (3) quantum confinement effects, or (4) a size-dependent degree of soot graphitization. Here, we report a size-dependent MAC for ex-situ soot sampled from two commercially available diffusion-flame soot generators, one aviation turbine engine, and one diesel generator. We also incorporate literature data. We show that the MAC increases with aggregate size until a plateau is reached at single particle masses between 4 and 30 fg (approximately 300-650 nm soot mobility diameter). The smallest particles may have MACs 50% to 80% smaller than the largest, depending on the source, while the largest particles have MACs within the range reported by previous measurements on polydisperse samples. Moreover, we show that models of hypotheses (1), (2), and (3) do not describe our measurement results, leaving hypothesis (4) as the only remaining candidate.

preprint2021arXiv

Systematic experimental comparison of particle filtration efficiency test methods for commercial respirators and face masks

Respirators, medical masks, and barrier face coverings all filter airborne particles using similar physical principles. However, they are tested for certification using a variety of standardized test methods, creating challenges for the comparison of differently certified products. We have performed systematic experiments to quantify and understand the differences between standardized test methods for N95 respirators (NIOSH TEB-APR-STP-0059 under US 42 CFR 84), medical face masks (ASTM F2299/F2100), and COVID-19-related barrier face coverings (ASTM F3502-21). Our experiments demonstrate the role of face velocity, particle properties (mean size, size variability, electric charge, density, and shape), measurement techniques, and environmental preconditioning. The measured filtration efficiency was most sensitive to changes in face velocity and particle charge. Relative to the NIOSH method, users of the ASTM F2299/F2100 method have commonly used non-neutralized (highly charged) aerosols as well as smaller face velocities, each of which may result in approximately 10% higher measured filtration efficiencies. In the NIOSH method, environmental conditioning at elevated humidity increased filtration efficiency in some commercial samples while decreasing it in others, indicating that measurement should be performed both with and without conditioning. More generally, our results provide an experimental basis for the comparison of respirators certified under various international methods, including FFP2, KN95, P2, Korea 1st Class, and DS2.