Paper detail

Simultaneous Stabilization in $A_\mathbb{R}(\mathbb{D})$

In this note we study the problem of simultaneous stabilization for the algebra $A_\R(\D)$. Invertible pairs $(f_j,g_j)$, $j=1,..., n$, in a commutative unital algebra are called \textit{simultaneously stabilizable} if there exists a pair $(α,β)$ of elements such that $αf_j+βg_j$ is invertible in this algebra for $j=1,..., n$. For $n=2$, the simultaneous stabilization problem admits a positive solution for any data if and only if the Bass stable rank of the algebra is one. Since $A_\R(\D)$ has stable rank two, we are faced here with a different situation. When $n=2$, necessary and sufficient conditions are given so that we have simultaneous stability in $A_\R(\D)$. For $n\geq 3$ we show that under these conditions simultaneous stabilization is not possible and further connect this result to the question of which pairs $(f,g)$ in $A_\R(\D)^2$ are totally reducible; that is, for which pairs do there exist two units $u$ and $v$ in $A_\R(\D)$ such that $uf+vg=1$.

preprint2008arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.