Paper detail

Simulating quantum field theory in curved spacetime with quantum many-body systems

This paper proposes a new general framework to build a one-to-one correspondence between quantum field theories in static 1+1 dimensional curved spacetime and quantum many-body systems. We show that a massless scalar field in an arbitrary 2-dimensional static spacetime is always equivalent to a site-dependent bosonic hopping model, while a massless Dirac field is equivalent to a site-dependent free Hubbard model or a site-dependent isotropic XY model. A possible experimental realization for such a correspondence in trapped ions system is suggested. As applications of the analogue gravity model, we show that they can be used to simulate Hawking radiation of black hole and to study its entanglement. We also show in the analogue model that black holes are most chaotic systems and the fastest scramblers in nature. We also offer a concrete example about how to get some insights about quantum many-body systems from back hole physics.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.