Paper detail

Signal-to-noise ratio analysis of single-pixel detection multiplexing under photon-noise. Cases of Hadamard and Cosine positive modulation

In typical single-pixel detection multiplexing, an unknown object is sequentially illuminated with intensity patterns: the total signal is summed into a single-pixel detector and is then demultiplexed to retrieve the object. Because of measurement noise, the retrieved object differs from the ground truth by some error quantified by the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). In situations where the noise only arises from the photon counting process, it has not been made clear if single-pixel detection multiplexing leads to a better SNR than simply scanning the object with a focused intensity spot - a modality known as raster scanning. This study theoretically assesses the SNR associated with certain types of single-pixel detection multiplexing, and compares it with raster scanning. In particular, we show that, under photon noise, when the positive intensity modulation is based on Hadamard or Cosine patterns, single-pixel detection multiplexing does not systematically improve the SNR as compared to raster scanning. Instead, it only improves the SNR on object pixels at least $k$ times brighter than the object mean signal $\bar{x}$, where $k$ is a constant that depends on the modulation scheme.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.