Paper detail

Shape-design for stabilizing micro-particles in inertial microfluidic flows

Design of microparticles which stabilize at the centerline of a channel flow when part of a dilute suspension is examined numerically for moderate Reynolds numbers ($10 \le Re \le 80$). Stability metrics for particles with arbitrary shapes are formulated based on linear-stability theory. Particle shape is parametrized by a compact, Non-Uniform Rational B-Spline (NURBS)-based representation. Shape-design is posed as an optimization problem and solved using adaptive Bayesian optimization. We focus on designing particles for maximal stability at the channel-centerline robust to perturbations. Our results indicate that centerline-focusing particles are families of characteristic "fish"/"bottle"/"dumbbell"-like shapes, exhibiting fore-aft asymmetry. A parametric exploration is then performed to identify stable particle-designs at different k's (particle chord-to-channel width ratio) and Re's ($0.1 \le k \le 0.4, 10 \le Re \le 80$). Particles at high-k's and Re's are highly stabilized when compared to those at low-k's and Re's. A comparison of the modified dumbbell designs from the current framework also shows better performance to perturbations in Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI) when compared to the rod-disk model reported previously (Uspal & Doyle 2014) for low-Re Hele-Shaw flow. We identify basins of attraction around the centerline, which span larger release-angle-ranges and lateral locations (tending to the channel width) for narrower channels, which effectively standardizes the notion of global focusing in such configurations using the current stability-paradigm. The present framework is illustrated for 2D cases and is potentially generalizable to stability in 3D flow-fields. The current formulation is also agnostic to Re and particle/channel geometry which indicates substantial potential for integration with imaging flow-cytometry tools and microfluidic biosensing-assays.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.