Abstract

Background: Measurements of forward exclusive meson production at different squared four-momenta of the exchanged virtual photon, Q2Q^2, and at different four-momentum transfer, t, can be used to probe QCD's transition from meson-nucleon degrees of freedom at long distances to quark-gluon degrees of freedom at short scales. Ratios of separated response functions in π−π^- and π+π^+ electroproduction are particularly informative. The ratio for transverse photons may allow this transition to be more easily observed, while the ratio for longitudinal photons provides a crucial verification of the assumed pole dominance, needed for reliable extraction of the pion form factor from electroproduction data. Method: Data were acquired with 2.6-5.2 GeV electron beams and the HMS+SOS spectrometers in Jefferson Lab Hall C, at central Q2Q^2 values of 0.6, 1.0, 1.6 GeV2^2 at W=1.95 GeV, and Q2Q^2=2.45 GeV2^2 at W=2.22 GeV. There was significant coverage in ϕϕ and εε, which allowed separation of σL,T,LT,TTσ_{L,T,LT,TT}. Results: σLσ_L shows a clear signature of the pion pole, with a sharp rise at small -t. In contrast, σTσ_T is much flatter versus t. The longitudinal/transverse ratios evolve with Q2Q^2 and t, and at the highest Q2Q^2=2.45 GeV2^2 show a slight enhancement for π−π^- production compared to π+π^+. The π−/π+π^-/π^+ ratio for transverse photons exhibits only a small Q2Q^2-dependence, following a nearly universal curve with t, with a steep transition to a value of about 0.25, consistent with s-channel quark knockout. The σTT/σTσ_{TT}/σ_T ratio also drops rapidly with Q2Q^2, qualitatively consistent with s-channel helicity conservation. The π−/π+π^-/π^+ ratio for longitudinal photons indicates a small isoscalar contamination at W=1.95 GeV, consistent with what was observed in our earlier determination of the pion form factor at these kinematics.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.