Paper detail

Self-Assessment for Single-Object Tracking in Clutter Using Subjective Logic

Reliable tracking algorithms are essential for automated driving. However, the existing consistency measures are not sufficient to meet the increasing safety demands in the automotive sector. Therefore, this work presents a novel method for self-assessment of single-object tracking in clutter based on Kalman filtering and subjective logic. A key feature of the approach is that it additionally provides a measure of the collected statistical evidence in its online reliability scores. In this way, various aspects of reliability, such as the correctness of the assumed measurement noise, detection probability, and clutter rate, can be monitored in addition to the overall assessment based on the available evidence. Here, we present a mathematical derivation of the reference distribution used in our self-assessment module for our studied problem. Moreover, we introduce a formula that describes how a threshold should be chosen for the degree of conflict, the subjective logic comparison measure used for the reliability decision making. Our approach is evaluated in a challenging simulation scenario designed to model adverse weather conditions. The simulations show that our method can significantly improve the reliability checking of single-object tracking in clutter in several aspects.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.