BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Thomas Griebel

Thomas Griebel contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
eess.SPeess.SYRoboticsSystems and ControlApplicationsmath.OCmath.PR

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Self-Assessment for Single-Object Tracking in Clutter Using Subjective Logic

Reliable tracking algorithms are essential for automated driving. However, the existing consistency measures are not sufficient to meet the increasing safety demands in the automotive sector. Therefore, this work presents a novel method for self-assessment of single-object tracking in clutter based on Kalman filtering and subjective logic. A key feature of the approach is that it additionally provides a measure of the collected statistical evidence in its online reliability scores. In this way, various aspects of reliability, such as the correctness of the assumed measurement noise, detection probability, and clutter rate, can be monitored in addition to the overall assessment based on the available evidence. Here, we present a mathematical derivation of the reference distribution used in our self-assessment module for our studied problem. Moreover, we introduce a formula that describes how a threshold should be chosen for the degree of conflict, the subjective logic comparison measure used for the reliability decision making. Our approach is evaluated in a challenging simulation scenario designed to model adverse weather conditions. The simulations show that our method can significantly improve the reliability checking of single-object tracking in clutter in several aspects.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Kalman Filter Meets Subjective Logic: A Self-Assessing Kalman Filter Using Subjective Logic

Self-assessment is a key to safety and robustness in automated driving. In order to design safer and more robust automated driving functions, the goal is to self-assess the performance of each module in a whole automated driving system. One crucial component in automated driving systems is the tracking of surrounding objects, where the Kalman filter is the most fundamental tracking algorithm. For Kalman filters, some classical online consistency measures exist for self-assessment, which are based on classical probability theory. However, these classical approaches lack the ability to measure the explicit statistical uncertainty within the self-assessment, which is an important quality measure, particularly, if only a small number of samples is available for the self-assessment. In this work, we propose a novel online self-assessment method using subjective logic, which is a modern extension of probabilistic logic that explicitly models the statistical uncertainty. Thus, by embedding classical Kalman filtering into subjective logic, our method additionally features an explicit measure for statistical uncertainty in the self-assessment.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access