Paper detail

SECA: Snapshot-based Event Detection for Checking Asynchronous Context Consistency in Ubiquitous Computing

Context-consistency checking is challenging in the dynamic and uncertain ubiquitous computing environments. This is because contexts are often noisy owing to unreliable sensing data streams, inaccurate data measurement, fragile connectivity and resource constraints. One of the state-of-the-art efforts is CEDA, which concurrently detects context consistency by exploring the \emph{happened-before} relation among events. However, CEDA is seriously limited by several side effects --- centralized detection manner that easily gets down the checker process, heavy computing complexity and false negative. In this paper, we propose SECA: Snapshot-based Event Detection for Checking Asynchronous Context Consistency in ubiquitous computing. SECA introduces snapshot-based timestamp to check event relations, which can detect scenarios where CEDA fails. Moreover, it simplifies the logical clock instead of adopting the vector clock, and thus significantly reduces both time and space complexity. Empirical studies show that SECA outperforms CEDA in terms of detection accuracy, scalability, and computing complexity.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.