Paper detail

Scintillation Event Localization in Hemi-Ellipsoid Detector for SPECT, a simulation study using Geant4 Monte-Carlo

A high sensitivity Cardiac SPECT system using curved crystals with pinhole collimation was proposed previously (Dey, IEEE TNS 2012, Bhusal et al, Med. Phys. 2019). Here, we hypothesize that a high curvature hemi-ellipsoid detector results in measurable differences in light distribution from events at different depths in the crystal. This was tested by analyzing the scintillation light in hemi-ellipsoid detector using Monte-Carlo (Geant4) and evaluation of both the localization error at detector and the back-projected errors in object-space. We used Geant4 to simulate the propagation of scintillation light in a monolithic hemi-ellipsoidal CsI crystal. A look-up table (LUT) was created to map the points inside the crystal to the expected light pattern on the crystal surface using Geant4. In thirteen zones across the crystal, gamma-rays were simulated and the resulting scintillator light intensity on the surface was captured, serving as our experimental interactions. A Poisson-statistics-based algorithm was developed to limit the search of the gamma-ray event locations into small regions of the LUT and fine-tuned by interpolating between selected LUT points by comparing the light distribution of the gamma interactions and LUT light patterns. The localized events were individually back-projected to the object mid-plane, and the errors recorded. Excluding some outliers (up to 2%), the localized errors averaged over all the zones was 0.71 (+/-0.44) mm with a worse case of 1.36 (+/-0.67) mm at the apex. When back-projected to the midplane of the object for Cardiac SPECT, the errors were <1mm and average error was 0.4(+/-0.22) mm, due to the high system magnification afforded by the detector. Thus, for our high sensitivity system, we were also able to achieve high resolution, assuming perfect pinhole collimator resolution recovery for Cardiac SPECT application.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.