Paper detail

Scaling Exponent for Incremental Records

We investigate records in a growing sequence of identical and independently distributed random variables. The record equals the largest value in the sequence, and our focus is on the increment, defined as the difference between two successive records. We investigate sequences in which all increments decrease monotonically, and find that the fraction I_N of sequences that exhibit this property decays algebraically with sequence length N, namely I_N ~ N^{-nu} as N --> infinity. We analyze the case where the random variables are drawn from a uniform distribution with compact support, and obtain the exponent nu = 0.317621... using analytic methods. We also study the record distribution and the increment distribution. Whereas the former is a narrow distribution with an exponential tail, the latter is broad and has a power-law tail characterized by the exponent nu. Empirical analysis of records in the sequence of waiting times between successive earthquakes is consistent with the theoretical results.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.