Paper detail

Scalable Influence Estimation Without Sampling

In a diffusion process on a network, how many nodes are expected to be influenced by a set of initial spreaders? This natural problem, often referred to as influence estimation, boils down to computing the marginal probability that a given node is active at a given time when the process starts from specified initial condition. Among many other applications, this task is crucial for a well-studied problem of influence maximization: finding optimal spreaders in a social network that maximize the influence spread by a certain time horizon. Indeed, influence estimation needs to be called multiple times for comparing candidate seed sets. Unfortunately, in many models of interest an exact computation of marginals is #P-hard. In practice, influence is often estimated using Monte-Carlo sampling methods that require a large number of runs for obtaining a high-fidelity prediction, especially at large times. It is thus desirable to develop analytic techniques as an alternative to sampling methods. Here, we suggest an algorithm for estimating the influence function in popular independent cascade model based on a scalable dynamic message-passing approach. This method has a computational complexity of a single Monte-Carlo simulation and provides an upper bound on the expected spread on a general graph, yielding exact answer for treelike networks. We also provide dynamic message-passing equations for a stochastic version of the linear threshold model. The resulting saving of a potentially large sampling factor in the running time compared to simulation-based techniques hence makes it possible to address large-scale problem instances.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.