Paper detail

Scalable Holistic Analysis of Multi-Source, Data-Intensive Problems Using Multilayered Networks

Holistic analysis of many real-world problems are based on data collected from multiple sources contributing to some aspect of that problem. The word fusion has also been used in the literature for such problems involving disparate data types. Holistically understanding traffic patterns, causes of accidents, bombings, terrorist planning and many natural phenomenon such as storms, earthquakes fall into this category. Some may have real-time requirements and some may need to be analyzed after the fact (post-mortem or forensic analysis.) What is common for all these problems is that the amount and types of data associated with the event. Data may also be incomplete and trustworthiness of sources may also vary. Currently, manual and ad-hoc approaches are used in aggregating data in different ways for analyzing and understanding these problems. In this paper, we approach this problem in a novel way using multilayered networks. We identify features of a central event and propose a network layer for each feature. This approach allows us to study the effect of each feature independently and its impact on the event. We also establish that the proposed approach allows us to compose these features in arbitrary ways (without loss of information) to analyze their combined effect. Additionally, formulation of relationships (e.g., distance measure for a single feature instead of several at the same time) is simpler. Further, computations can be done once on each layer in this approach and reused for mixing and matching the features for aggregate impacts and "what if" scenarios to understand the problem holistically. This has been demonstrated by recreating the communities for the AND-Composed network by using the communities of the individual layers. We believe that techniques proposed here make an important contribution to the nascent yet fast growing area of data fusion.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.