BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Sanjukta Bhowmick

Sanjukta Bhowmick contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
physics.soc-phSocial and Information NetworksDatabases

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

A New Community Definition For MultiLayer Networks And A Novel Approach For Its Efficient Computation

As the use of MultiLayer Networks (or MLNs) for modeling and analysis is gaining popularity, it is becoming increasingly important to propose a community definition that encompasses the multiple features represented by MLNs and develop algorithms for efficiently computing communities on MLNs. Currently, communities for MLNs, are based on aggregating the networks into single graphs using different techniques (type independent, projection-based, etc.) and applying single graph community detection algorithms, such as Louvain and Infomap on these graphs. This process results in different types of information loss (semantics and structure). To the best of our knowledge, in this paper we propose, for the first time, a definition of community for heterogeneous MLNs (or HeMLNs) which preserves semantics as well as the structure. Additionally, our basic definition can be extended to appropriately match the analysis objectives as needed. In this paper, we present a structure and semantics preserving community definition for HeMLNs that is compatible with and is an extension of the traditional definition for single graphs. We also present a framework for its efficient computation using a newly proposed decoupling approach. First, we define a k-community for connected k layers of a HeMLN. Then we propose a family of algorithms for its computation using the concept of bipartite graph pairings. Further, for a broader analysis, we introduce several pairing algorithms and weight metrics for composing binary HeMLN communities using participating community characteristics. Essentially, this results in an extensible family of community computations. We provide extensive experimental results for showcasing the efficiency and analysis flexibility of the proposed computation using popular IMDb and DBLP data sets.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Permanence and Community Structure in Complex Networks

The goal of community detection algorithms is to identify densely-connected units within large networks. An implicit assumption is that all the constituent nodes belong equally to their associated community. However, some nodes are more important in the community than others. To date, efforts have been primarily driven to identify communities as a whole, rather than understanding to what extent an individual node belongs to its community. Therefore, most metrics for evaluating communities, for example modularity, are global. These metrics produce a score for each community, not for each individual node. In this paper, we argue that the belongingness of nodes in a community is not uniform. The central idea of permanence is based on the observation that the strength of membership of a vertex to a community depends upon two factors: (i) the the extent of connections of the vertex within its community versus outside its community, and (ii) how tightly the vertex is connected internally. We discuss how permanence can help us understand and utilize the structure and evolution of communities by demonstrating that it can be used to -- (i) measure the persistence of a vertex in a community, (ii) design strategies to strengthen the community structure, (iii) explore the core-periphery structure within a community, and (iv) select suitable initiators for message spreading. We demonstrate that the process of maximizing permanence produces meaningful communities that concur with the ground-truth community structure of the networks more accurately than eight other popular community detection algorithms. Finally, we show that the communities obtained by this method are (i) less affected by the changes in vertex-ordering, and (ii) more resilient to resolution limit, degeneracy of solutions and asymptotic growth of values.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

On the Permanence of Vertices in Network Communities

Despite the prevalence of community detection algorithms, relatively less work has been done on understanding whether a network is indeed modular and how resilient the community structure is under perturbations. To address this issue, we propose a new vertex-based metric called "permanence", that can quantitatively give an estimate of the community-like structure of the network. The central idea of permanence is based on the observation that the strength of membership of a vertex to a community depends upon the following two factors: (i) the distribution of external connectivity of the vertex to individual communities and not the total external connectivity, and (ii) the strength of its internal connectivity and not just the total internal edges. In this paper, we demonstrate that compared to other metrics, permanence provides (i) a more accurate estimate of a derived community structure to the ground-truth community and (ii) is more sensitive to perturbations in the network. As a by-product of this study, we have also developed a community detection algorithm based on maximizing permanence. For a modular network structure, the results of our algorithm match well with ground-truth communities.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Constant Communities in Complex Networks

Identifying community structure is a fundamental problem in network analysis. Most community detection algorithms are based on optimizing a combinatorial parameter, for example modularity. This optimization is generally NP-hard, thus merely changing the vertex order can alter their assignments to the community. However, there has been very less study on how vertex ordering influences the results of the community detection algorithms. Here we identify and study the properties of invariant groups of vertices (constant communities) whose assignment to communities are, quite remarkably, not affected by vertex ordering. The percentage of constant communities can vary across different applications and based on empirical results we propose metrics to evaluate these communities. Using constant communities as a pre-processing step, one can significantly reduce the variation of the results. Finally, we present a case study on phoneme network and illustrate that constant communities, quite strikingly, form the core functional units of the larger communities.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access