Paper detail

Robust Covariance Estimation under Imperfect Constraints using an Expected Likelihood Approach

We address the problem of structured covariance matrix estimation for radar space-time adaptive processing (STAP). A priori knowledge of the interference environment has been exploited in many previous works to enable accurate estimators even when training is not generous. Specifically, recent work has shown that employing practical constraints such as the rank of clutter subspace and the condition number of disturbance covariance leads to powerful estimators that have closed form solutions. While rank and the condition number are very effective constraints, often practical non-idealities makes it difficult for them to be known precisely using physical models. Therefore, we propose a robust covariance estimation method for radar STAP via an expected likelihood (EL) approach. We analyze covariance estimation algorithms under three cases of imperfect constraints: 1) a rank constraint, 2) both rank and noise power constraints, and 3) condition number constraint. In each case, we formulate precise constraint determination as an optimization problem using the EL criterion. For each of the three cases, we derive new analytical results which allow for computationally efficient, practical ways of setting these constraints. In particular, we prove formally that both the rank and condition number as determined by the EL criterion are unique. Through experimental results from a simulation model and the KASSPER data set, we show the estimator with optimal constraints obtained by the EL approach outperforms state of the art alternatives.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.