Source author record

Muralidhar Rangaswamy

Muralidhar Rangaswamy appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

eess.SP Methodology Systems and Control

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works

3topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

High Fidelity RF Clutter Modeling and Simulation

In this paper, we present a tutorial overview of state-of-the-art radio frequency (RF) clutter modeling and simulation (M&S) techniques. Traditional statistical approximation based methods will be reviewed followed by more accurate physics-based stochastic transfer function clutter models that facilitate site-specific simulations anywhere on earth. The various factors that go into the computation of these transfer functions will be presented, followed by several examples across multiple RF applications. Finally, we introduce a radar challenge dataset generated using these tools that can enable testing and benchmarking of all cognitive radar algorithms and techniques.

preprint2019arXiv

How to Calibrate your Adversary's Capabilities? Inverse Filtering for Counter-Autonomous Systems

We consider an adversarial Bayesian signal processing problem involving "us" and an "adversary". The adversary observes our state in noise; updates its posterior distribution of the state and then chooses an action based on this posterior. Given knowledge of "our" state and sequence of adversary's actions observed in noise, we consider three problems: (i) How can the adversary's posterior distribution be estimated? Estimating the posterior is an inverse filtering problem involving a random measure - we formulate and solve several versions of this problem in a Bayesian setting. (ii) How can the adversary's observation likelihood be estimated? This tells us how accurate the adversary's sensors are. We compute the maximum likelihood estimator for the adversary's observation likelihood given our measurements of the adversary's actions where the adversary's actions are in response to estimating our state. (iii) How can the state be chosen by us to minimize the covariance of the estimate of the adversary's observation likelihood? "Our" state can be viewed as a probe signal which causes the adversary to act; so choosing the optimal state sequence is an input design problem. The above questions are motivated by the design of counter-autonomous systems: given measurements of the actions of a sophisticated autonomous adversary, how can our counter-autonomous system estimate the underlying belief of the adversary, predict future actions and therefore guard against these actions.

preprint2016arXiv

Robust Covariance Estimation under Imperfect Constraints using an Expected Likelihood Approach

We address the problem of structured covariance matrix estimation for radar space-time adaptive processing (STAP). A priori knowledge of the interference environment has been exploited in many previous works to enable accurate estimators even when training is not generous. Specifically, recent work has shown that employing practical constraints such as the rank of clutter subspace and the condition number of disturbance covariance leads to powerful estimators that have closed form solutions. While rank and the condition number are very effective constraints, often practical non-idealities makes it difficult for them to be known precisely using physical models. Therefore, we propose a robust covariance estimation method for radar STAP via an expected likelihood (EL) approach. We analyze covariance estimation algorithms under three cases of imperfect constraints: 1) a rank constraint, 2) both rank and noise power constraints, and 3) condition number constraint. In each case, we formulate precise constraint determination as an optimization problem using the EL criterion. For each of the three cases, we derive new analytical results which allow for computationally efficient, practical ways of setting these constraints. In particular, we prove formally that both the rank and condition number as determined by the EL criterion are unique. Through experimental results from a simulation model and the KASSPER data set, we show the estimator with optimal constraints obtained by the EL approach outperforms state of the art alternatives.

preprint2015arXiv

Joint Filter and Waveform Design for Radar STAP in Signal Dependent Interference

Waveform design is a pivotal component of the fully adaptive radar construct. In this paper we consider waveform design for radar space time adaptive processing (STAP), accounting for the waveform dependence of the clutter correlation matrix. Due to this dependence, in general, the joint problem of receiver filter optimization and radar waveform design becomes an intractable, non-convex optimization problem, Nevertheless, it is however shown to be individually convex either in the filter or in the waveform variables. We derive constrained versions of: a) the alternating minimization algorithm, b) proximal alternating minimization, and c) the constant modulus alternating minimization, which, at each step, iteratively optimizes either the STAP filter or the waveform independently. A fast and slow time model permits waveform design in radar STAP but the primary bottleneck is the computational complexity of the algorithms.