Paper detail

Rigorous Explanation of Inference on Probabilistic Graphical Models

Probabilistic graphical models, such as Markov random fields (MRF), exploit dependencies among random variables to model a rich family of joint probability distributions. Sophisticated inference algorithms, such as belief propagation (BP), can effectively compute the marginal posteriors. Nonetheless, it is still difficult to interpret the inference outcomes for important human decision making. There is no existing method to rigorously attribute the inference outcomes to the contributing factors of the graphical models. Shapley values provide an axiomatic framework, but naively computing or even approximating the values on general graphical models is challenging and less studied. We propose GraphShapley to integrate the decomposability of Shapley values, the structure of MRFs, and the iterative nature of BP inference in a principled way for fast Shapley value computation, that 1) systematically enumerates the important contributions to the Shapley values of the explaining variables without duplicate; 2) incrementally compute the contributions without starting from scratches. We theoretically characterize GraphShapley regarding independence, equal contribution, and additivity. On nine graphs, we demonstrate that GraphShapley provides sensible and practical explanations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.