Paper detail

$σ$-Ridge: group regularized ridge regression via empirical Bayes noise level cross-validation

Features in predictive models are not exchangeable, yet common supervised models treat them as such. Here we study ridge regression when the analyst can partition the features into $K$ groups based on external side-information. For example, in high-throughput biology, features may represent gene expression, protein abundance or clinical data and so each feature group represents a distinct modality. The analyst's goal is to choose optimal regularization parameters $λ= (λ_1, \dotsc, λ_K)$ -- one for each group. In this work, we study the impact of $λ$ on the predictive risk of group-regularized ridge regression by deriving limiting risk formulae under a high-dimensional random effects model with $p\asymp n$ as $n \to \infty$. Furthermore, we propose a data-driven method for choosing $λ$ that attains the optimal asymptotic risk: The key idea is to interpret the residual noise variance $σ^2$, as a regularization parameter to be chosen through cross-validation. An empirical Bayes construction maps the one-dimensional parameter $σ$ to the $K$-dimensional vector of regularization parameters, i.e., $σ\mapsto \widehatλ(σ)$. Beyond its theoretical optimality, the proposed method is practical and runs as fast as cross-validated ridge regression without feature groups ($K=1$).

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.