Paper detail

Reward Tweaking: Maximizing the Total Reward While Planning for Short Horizons

In reinforcement learning, the discount factor $γ$ controls the agent's effective planning horizon. Traditionally, this parameter was considered part of the MDP; however, as deep reinforcement learning algorithms tend to become unstable when the effective planning horizon is long, recent works refer to $γ$ as a hyper-parameter -- thus changing the underlying MDP and potentially leading the agent towards sub-optimal behavior on the original task. In this work, we introduce \emph{reward tweaking}. Reward tweaking learns a surrogate reward function $\tilde r$ for the discounted setting that induces optimal behavior on the original finite-horizon total reward task. Theoretically, we show that there exists a surrogate reward that leads to optimality in the original task and discuss the robustness of our approach. Additionally, we perform experiments in high-dimensional continuous control tasks and show that reward tweaking guides the agent towards better long-horizon returns although it plans for short horizons.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.