Paper detail

Revisiting the Mazur bound and the Suzuki equality

Among the few known rigorous results for time-dependent equilibrium correlations, important for understanding transport properties, are the Mazur bound and the Suzuki equality. The Mazur inequality gives a lower bound, on the long-time average of the time-dependent auto-correlation function of observables, in terms of equilibrium correlation functions involving conserved quantities. On the other hand, Suzuki proposes an exact equality for quantum systems. In this paper, we discuss the relation between the two results and in particular, look for the analogue of the Suzuki result for classical systems. This requires us to examine as to what constitutes a complete set of conserved quantities required to saturate the Mazur bound. We present analytic arguments as well as illustrative numerical results from a number of different systems. Our examples include systems with few degrees of freedom as well as many-particle integrable models, both free and interacting.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.