Paper detail

Renormalization of earthquake aftershocks

Together with the Gutenberg-Richter distribution of earthquake magnitudes, Omori&#39;s law is the best established empirical characterization of earthquake sequences and states that the number of smaller earthquakes per unit time triggered by a main shock decays approximately as the inverse of the time ($1/t^p$, with $p \approx 1$) since the main shock. Based on these observations, we explore the theoretical hypothesis in which each earthquake can produce a series of aftershock independently of its size according to its ``local&#39;&#39; Omori&#39;s law with exponent $p=1+θ$. In this scenario, an aftershock of the main shock produces itself other aftershocks which themselves produce aftershocks, and so on. The global observable Omori&#39;s law is found to have two distinct power law regimes, the first one with exponent $p_-=1 - θ$ for time $t < t^* \sim κ^{-1/θ}$, where $0<1-κ<1$ measures the fraction of triggered earthquakes per triggering earthquake, and the second one with exponent $p_+=1 + θ$ for larger times. The existence of these two regimes rationalizes the observation of Kisslinger and Jones [1991] that the Omori&#39;s exponent $p$ seems positively correlated to the surface heat flow: a higher heat flow is a signature of a higher crustal temperature, which leads to larger strain relaxation by creep, corresponding to fewer events triggered per earthquake, i.e. to a larger $κ$, and thus to a smaller $t^*$, leading to an effective measured exponent more heavily weighted toward $p_+>1$.

preprint1999arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.